ナルニア国物語/第3章:アスラン王と魔法の島 4枚組3D・2Dブルーレイ&DVD&デジタルコピー(初回生産限定) [Blu-ray]
フォーマット | 色, ドルビー, 吹き替え, 限定版, DTS Stereo, ワイドスクリーン, 3D |
コントリビュータ | ジョージー・ヘンリー, マイケル・アプテッド, ベン・バーンズ, ウィル・ポールター, スキャンダー・ケインズ |
言語 | 英語, 日本語 |
稼働時間 | 1 時間 53 分 |
この商品を見た後にお客様が購入した商品
ページ: 1 / 1 最初に戻るページ: 1 / 1
商品の説明
初登場第1位!
最高峰のファンタジー・アドベンチャー 海を舞台に新たな冒険へいざ出航!
誰も知らないナルニアの海へ。
<キャスト&スタッフ>
ルーシー… ジョージー・ヘンリー(宇山玲加)
エドマンド…スキャンダー・ケインズ(畠中祐)
カスピアン…ベン・バーンズ(尾上菊之助)
ユースチス…ウィル・ポールター(朴璐美)
監督:マイケル・アプテッド
脚本:クリストファー・マルクス/スティーヴン・マクフィーリー/マイケル・ペトローニ
製作:マーク・ジョンソン/アンドリュー・アダムソン/フィリップ・ステュアー
●字幕翻訳:松浦美奈 ●吹替翻訳:佐藤恵子
<ストーリー>
ペベンシー兄妹のエドマンドとルーシーは、いとこのユースチスとともに船の絵画を見ているうちに、ナルニアの世界へと引き込まれる。気づくと彼らは、懐かしいカスピアン王子やもの言うネズミの騎士、リーピチープたちの乗る帆船に乗船していた。待ち受ける魔法、不思議な生き物や邪悪な影からナルニアを守るため、そして、友であり、ナルニアの保護者でもあるアスランとの再会を果たすため、彼らは海の果てを目指す ――。
<ポイント>
●アスランの毛並みに手が届く!水しぶきが吹きかかる!シリーズ初の 3D映像で新たな伝説を目撃する!
※期間限定特典デジタルコピー:2012年7月6日まで
<特典>
【ブルーレイ(3D)】
なし
【ブルーレイ(2D)】
●朝びらき丸(※):
●声の島(※):
●ラマンドゥの島(※):
●離れ島諸島(※):
●くらやみ島(※):
●金水島(※):
●BD-LIVE特典:最新情報(※)
※ブルーレイディスクのみの収録特典
【DVD(本編)】
なし
【DVD(Digital Copy)】
●Digital Copy(iTunes&PSN)
登録情報
- アスペクト比 : 1.78:1
- メーカーにより製造中止になりました : いいえ
- 言語 : 英語, 日本語
- 製品サイズ : 30 x 10 x 20 cm; 83.16 g
- EAN : 4988142851123
- 監督 : マイケル・アプテッド
- メディア形式 : 色, ドルビー, 吹き替え, 限定版, DTS Stereo, ワイドスクリーン, 3D
- 時間 : 1 時間 53 分
- 発売日 : 2011/7/6
- 出演 : ジョージー・ヘンリー, スキャンダー・ケインズ, ベン・バーンズ, ウィル・ポールター
- 字幕: : 日本語, 英語
- 販売元 : 20世紀フォックス・ホーム・エンターテイメント・ジャパン
- ASIN : B004XYG2X8
- ディスク枚数 : 4
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 134,708位DVD (DVDの売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 9,503位ブルーレイ 外国映画
- - 34,457位外国映画 (DVD)
- カスタマーレビュー:
-
トップレビュー
上位レビュー、対象国: 日本
レビューのフィルタリング中に問題が発生しました。後でもう一度試してください。
2024年2月1日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
アスランの存在感圧倒的ですよね。砂浜とライオンという組み合わせが個人的にはすごく印象的です。
2023年8月22日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
ナルニア国物語の、不思議な世界感がすごく好きです。景色に、物語とほんと、楽しくて、ナリニアの国に引き込まれる感じがします。子供の頃、成長したルーシーか、とでも魅力的で、ほんと、素敵だなぁーと思います。
2021年8月21日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
期待どおりの面白さでした。
2011年10月27日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
カスピアン、エドマンド、ルーシー、ユースチスの海の冒険映画です。
1作目から通して観ているなら背景は理解できますが、この映画単体となると少し解らない所があるかもしれません。
(個人的には1,2作の方がシンプルで好きでした)
この映画は、前々作や前作と違う形となっています。
ピーターやスーザンは幻のような形で出演しますが直接的な関与はありません。
新たな出演者として、いとこのユースチスが出てくるので、この子の存在が物語に影響を与えています。
気づいたのは、物語の背後の「敵ボス」のようなキャラがいないことでしょうか・・・
魔法の島々へ行き、その魔法の呪縛からナルニアの人々の開放を目指すのですが、結局は誰がその魔法を用意したのかが疑問でした。
1作目のような白い魔女のようなボス的な魔女でも出てくるのかと思ったらそうしたボスは出てきません。
結局、魔法を解く方法は教えられるのでその通りに行動して解決するのですが・・・
過去の2作で圧倒的な力を示したアスランも最後のほうに少し出てくるだけです。
この映画は、突き詰めた観方をするといくらでも突っ込みたくなってしまうので
素直な子供のように観ていく方が楽しめるのかもしれません。
エドマンドやルーシーたちもこの3作目で最後のようですので、もし次回作られるとするとユースチスが主役になるのでしょうか・・・
1作目から通して観ているなら背景は理解できますが、この映画単体となると少し解らない所があるかもしれません。
(個人的には1,2作の方がシンプルで好きでした)
この映画は、前々作や前作と違う形となっています。
ピーターやスーザンは幻のような形で出演しますが直接的な関与はありません。
新たな出演者として、いとこのユースチスが出てくるので、この子の存在が物語に影響を与えています。
気づいたのは、物語の背後の「敵ボス」のようなキャラがいないことでしょうか・・・
魔法の島々へ行き、その魔法の呪縛からナルニアの人々の開放を目指すのですが、結局は誰がその魔法を用意したのかが疑問でした。
1作目のような白い魔女のようなボス的な魔女でも出てくるのかと思ったらそうしたボスは出てきません。
結局、魔法を解く方法は教えられるのでその通りに行動して解決するのですが・・・
過去の2作で圧倒的な力を示したアスランも最後のほうに少し出てくるだけです。
この映画は、突き詰めた観方をするといくらでも突っ込みたくなってしまうので
素直な子供のように観ていく方が楽しめるのかもしれません。
エドマンドやルーシーたちもこの3作目で最後のようですので、もし次回作られるとするとユースチスが主役になるのでしょうか・・・
2023年2月6日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
終わりが、つぎのはじまりであるようなかんじで、また、新たな冒険があるのかな?と、おもえました。
2022年12月24日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
期待通り良さそうです。3枚組で購入しました。大人になった娘が繰り返し見ています。
他の国からのトップレビュー

Sara L. Wilmott
5つ星のうち5.0
Lucy and her brother learn about their uniqueness in Narnia!
2024年1月5日にカナダでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Wonderful story sequence written by CS Lewis, the same which helps children and those in their early teens, how to deal with their own short-comings with the help of Azlan.. Azlan is a Turkish name, which is why Turks find this entire series so delightful; even Muslim Turks do so, realizing that the Lord Jesus Christ depicted as the Lion of Juda in Narnia, was given a Turkish name rather than a Jewish or Greek one.,

zapp alexander
5つ星のうち5.0
Toller Film
2024年3月26日にドイツでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Sehr Gute Ware wie beschrieben.Sehr schnelle Zustellung der Ware innerhalb von ein paar Tagen war die Ware vorort.Ware zu diesem Preis wie beschrieben.Ein vollends zuvorkommender Service in der bearbeitung der Bestellten Ware besonders im Gebiet der Sendeverfolgung.Ein sehr sehr gutes Preisleistungsverhältnis.Volle Zufriedenheit mit der von mir bestelltenWare.Ein echtes Schnäppchen!!!!!!!!!

Jaganathan
5つ星のうち5.0
Excellent
2021年7月17日にインドでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Pitcher and sound
Very good.
Thank you.
Very good.
Thank you.

Pete
5つ星のうち5.0
Great Movie
2015年10月8日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Well worth the money.

Mooncarrot the Hare
5つ星のうち5.0
Goodbye Lucy and Edmund, until the end of time.
2011年5月21日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is by far and away the best of the three Chronicles of Narnia films.
The artistry is superb and a number of scenes from the book have been imaginatively visualised to the viewer's great pleasure. Coriakin's island of the Dufflepuds and his mansion with the evening sunlight streaming through the hallway merit a special mention for evoking a haunting atmosphere. The soundtrack has memorable moments. In particular the score for the scene where Aslan `undragons' Eustace is both grave and moving; and conveys, in a way words never could, the majestic pity in the grace of this act of charity of the King of all Narnian Kings. Will Poulter is worth watching for his performance as the boy with the almost-deserved name. And there's the cameo role for Douglas Gresham (who is also the voice of the newsreader in the first film).
However, all true Narnians will be sad that this is very likely the last of the big screen versions of these tales. This can be seen in the fact that the scriptwriters and producers have done a very clever job of incorporating significant stylistic elements from the other books into this film without altering the story too much.
Narrowhaven, deserted in the evening light, is Charn under its red sun. Bells announce the arrival of danger, as the ringing of one does in The Magician's Nephew . The hall of the governor is modelled on Charn's hall of images. The `snakes' of green mist do the service of representing the green snake that kills Rilian's mother and, in human form, abducts him, in The Silver Chair (the mist `abducts' the Narrowhaveners). Eustace slashing with the sword at the enveloping `snakes' of green mist is Rillian fighting the Green witch-turned-serpent (and this scene serves as Eustace's reappearance to save Narnia, which occurs in The Silver Chair).
The Green witch herself appears in the form of Tilda Swinton's green-tinted White witch. She dies when Edmund kills the sea serpent (a snake), in the same manner as the Green witch when Rillian attacks her with his sword. Ramandu's daughter is their guide, doing the service of Puddleglum who is the children's guide in The Silver Chair. She descends from the sky like the stars in The Last Battle. Lucy speaking the spell beautiful, and then waking, is Jill Pole in the castle of the giants when Aslan makes her see clearly, in a dream during a rainy night (there is a storm at sea), what she see ought to have seen (and Jill is given her own inclusion at the end of the film).
The Calormenes and their defeat at the fight at Anvard get a mention in Caspian's summation of the state of Narnia. Gale is reminiscent of Aravis from The Horse and his Boy, who likewise leaves home for an adventure. Susan's liking for lipstick is given a graphic representation - and a reversal when she wants to go back to Narnia (it should have been because she is 'once a queen in Narnia, always a queen'). And the flooding of the bedroom, and by implication, Earth, at the beginning of the film is the flooding of Narnia in The Last Battle; both are the same apocalyptic image.
So there we have it: five books in one film.
If there should be a major criticism of the film it would have to be about its underlying ethos. Everyone knows that Lewis was a Christian and his stories are `about God'. Yet the alterations in the story that have been made to give the film a necessary flow of tension and relief suggest something else.
Dark Island is described as a place of `pure evil'. It sits opposite Ramandu's Island, where Aslan's Table is located. This implies the existence of two equal and opposite powers competing for control of the world. This is dualism, something Lewis argued against. For Christian cinema-goers, the idea that darkness is in itself evil or is the symbol of evil is certainly not scriptural.
The seven swords of Aslan (invented for this film, but perhaps inspired by the tree of protection that Aslan once plants) have to be aligned to release `healing' energy and put the world right. This is a typical motif of a philosophy called monism. Its religious derivative, pantheism, is something Lewis wrote strongly against. However if the seven swords are intended to be representative of the seven novels then that would be an appropriate tribute.
There is another problem with the addition of the seven swords. Coriakin tells the travellers that they must lay the seven swords on Aslan's table on Ramandu's Island in order to destroy evil. He sent the six lords to do just that. However at that point in the film one sword has already been left behind on the Lone Islands and another on Goldwater Island. So the lords could never have fulfilled their mission. This illustrates the problem of scriptwriters trying to change and complicate the original plot of a book. What was obviously necessary for the film version was to make a visible and central evil opponent. This has been done by orchestrating the sea serpent and Dark island into a crescendo. The book lacks this as it is simply a journey (an illustration of the journey of faith).
This inconsistency with the seven swords could never have been passed off in a book. This is because the reader has to constantly use his or her imagination as they read. That it can pass unobserved in a film shows how much the medium of film hoovers out the audience's imagination.
Then there is confusion about where temptation comes from exactly. Does it come from the 'darkness within', as Coriakin says? Or does it come from outside, as Lucy says to Edmund and Caspian by the underground pool that turns everything to gold? The Gospel view of the source of temptation is the human heart (a person's conscience, will and affections). The book, illustrating the journey of faith, was in a strict sense about resisting temptation. The idea that there is light and dark within each person, and they only have to turn to the light, is an idea that begs the question that Lewis asked: What makes light so attractive? Why turn to the light when the dark can get you what you want equally well (as the pantheist Nikabrik turns with alacrity from Aslan to the servants of the White witch in the story of Prince Caspian)? The attraction to the light must come from without.
After being `undragoned', Eustace says, "It wasn't all bad being a dragon. I think I was a better dragon than a boy". Why, then, be `undragoned' at all? His speech implies that a dragon is someone who has good and bad inside them, and all that is required is to turn them inside out like an old sock for them to be as right as rain. Whatever this idea is, it is not the Christian theology that Lewis wrote about. The spell that Lucy recites to make the unseen seen equates psychology, psychiatry and theology as acceptable means of making things visible. What can `enquiring within', the practice of the first two of these three things, reveal to you if out of the human heart come evil thoughts?
The scene where Lucy uses the spell on board the ship to make herself beautiful has been illustrated in a striking way in this film. The change from the stormy weather to the complete calm of a sunlit morning is very evocative of Lucy's change of mood from disturbance to resolute action. But is it what Lewis really intended? Lucy does not 'doubt her value', a morally neutral act, but rather commits the sin of jealousy. Nor does her action in the book wish herself away. In the book Lucy becomes a Helen of Troy figure; the face that launched a thousand ships, and a war.
All this may seem to weigh heavily against any possible enjoyment of the film. However, I think we can use one of Lewis' own metaphors here. All these things objected to above can be regarded as the wasps that buzz around while you are having a picnic in a beautiful part of the countryside. You needn't let them stop you having the picnic or enjoying the view.
All true Narnians who will miss Lucy and Edmund until the end of time can certainly enjoy this film until that time when time does indeed end.
The artistry is superb and a number of scenes from the book have been imaginatively visualised to the viewer's great pleasure. Coriakin's island of the Dufflepuds and his mansion with the evening sunlight streaming through the hallway merit a special mention for evoking a haunting atmosphere. The soundtrack has memorable moments. In particular the score for the scene where Aslan `undragons' Eustace is both grave and moving; and conveys, in a way words never could, the majestic pity in the grace of this act of charity of the King of all Narnian Kings. Will Poulter is worth watching for his performance as the boy with the almost-deserved name. And there's the cameo role for Douglas Gresham (who is also the voice of the newsreader in the first film).
However, all true Narnians will be sad that this is very likely the last of the big screen versions of these tales. This can be seen in the fact that the scriptwriters and producers have done a very clever job of incorporating significant stylistic elements from the other books into this film without altering the story too much.
Narrowhaven, deserted in the evening light, is Charn under its red sun. Bells announce the arrival of danger, as the ringing of one does in The Magician's Nephew . The hall of the governor is modelled on Charn's hall of images. The `snakes' of green mist do the service of representing the green snake that kills Rilian's mother and, in human form, abducts him, in The Silver Chair (the mist `abducts' the Narrowhaveners). Eustace slashing with the sword at the enveloping `snakes' of green mist is Rillian fighting the Green witch-turned-serpent (and this scene serves as Eustace's reappearance to save Narnia, which occurs in The Silver Chair).
The Green witch herself appears in the form of Tilda Swinton's green-tinted White witch. She dies when Edmund kills the sea serpent (a snake), in the same manner as the Green witch when Rillian attacks her with his sword. Ramandu's daughter is their guide, doing the service of Puddleglum who is the children's guide in The Silver Chair. She descends from the sky like the stars in The Last Battle. Lucy speaking the spell beautiful, and then waking, is Jill Pole in the castle of the giants when Aslan makes her see clearly, in a dream during a rainy night (there is a storm at sea), what she see ought to have seen (and Jill is given her own inclusion at the end of the film).
The Calormenes and their defeat at the fight at Anvard get a mention in Caspian's summation of the state of Narnia. Gale is reminiscent of Aravis from The Horse and his Boy, who likewise leaves home for an adventure. Susan's liking for lipstick is given a graphic representation - and a reversal when she wants to go back to Narnia (it should have been because she is 'once a queen in Narnia, always a queen'). And the flooding of the bedroom, and by implication, Earth, at the beginning of the film is the flooding of Narnia in The Last Battle; both are the same apocalyptic image.
So there we have it: five books in one film.
If there should be a major criticism of the film it would have to be about its underlying ethos. Everyone knows that Lewis was a Christian and his stories are `about God'. Yet the alterations in the story that have been made to give the film a necessary flow of tension and relief suggest something else.
Dark Island is described as a place of `pure evil'. It sits opposite Ramandu's Island, where Aslan's Table is located. This implies the existence of two equal and opposite powers competing for control of the world. This is dualism, something Lewis argued against. For Christian cinema-goers, the idea that darkness is in itself evil or is the symbol of evil is certainly not scriptural.
The seven swords of Aslan (invented for this film, but perhaps inspired by the tree of protection that Aslan once plants) have to be aligned to release `healing' energy and put the world right. This is a typical motif of a philosophy called monism. Its religious derivative, pantheism, is something Lewis wrote strongly against. However if the seven swords are intended to be representative of the seven novels then that would be an appropriate tribute.
There is another problem with the addition of the seven swords. Coriakin tells the travellers that they must lay the seven swords on Aslan's table on Ramandu's Island in order to destroy evil. He sent the six lords to do just that. However at that point in the film one sword has already been left behind on the Lone Islands and another on Goldwater Island. So the lords could never have fulfilled their mission. This illustrates the problem of scriptwriters trying to change and complicate the original plot of a book. What was obviously necessary for the film version was to make a visible and central evil opponent. This has been done by orchestrating the sea serpent and Dark island into a crescendo. The book lacks this as it is simply a journey (an illustration of the journey of faith).
This inconsistency with the seven swords could never have been passed off in a book. This is because the reader has to constantly use his or her imagination as they read. That it can pass unobserved in a film shows how much the medium of film hoovers out the audience's imagination.
Then there is confusion about where temptation comes from exactly. Does it come from the 'darkness within', as Coriakin says? Or does it come from outside, as Lucy says to Edmund and Caspian by the underground pool that turns everything to gold? The Gospel view of the source of temptation is the human heart (a person's conscience, will and affections). The book, illustrating the journey of faith, was in a strict sense about resisting temptation. The idea that there is light and dark within each person, and they only have to turn to the light, is an idea that begs the question that Lewis asked: What makes light so attractive? Why turn to the light when the dark can get you what you want equally well (as the pantheist Nikabrik turns with alacrity from Aslan to the servants of the White witch in the story of Prince Caspian)? The attraction to the light must come from without.
After being `undragoned', Eustace says, "It wasn't all bad being a dragon. I think I was a better dragon than a boy". Why, then, be `undragoned' at all? His speech implies that a dragon is someone who has good and bad inside them, and all that is required is to turn them inside out like an old sock for them to be as right as rain. Whatever this idea is, it is not the Christian theology that Lewis wrote about. The spell that Lucy recites to make the unseen seen equates psychology, psychiatry and theology as acceptable means of making things visible. What can `enquiring within', the practice of the first two of these three things, reveal to you if out of the human heart come evil thoughts?
The scene where Lucy uses the spell on board the ship to make herself beautiful has been illustrated in a striking way in this film. The change from the stormy weather to the complete calm of a sunlit morning is very evocative of Lucy's change of mood from disturbance to resolute action. But is it what Lewis really intended? Lucy does not 'doubt her value', a morally neutral act, but rather commits the sin of jealousy. Nor does her action in the book wish herself away. In the book Lucy becomes a Helen of Troy figure; the face that launched a thousand ships, and a war.
All this may seem to weigh heavily against any possible enjoyment of the film. However, I think we can use one of Lewis' own metaphors here. All these things objected to above can be regarded as the wasps that buzz around while you are having a picnic in a beautiful part of the countryside. You needn't let them stop you having the picnic or enjoying the view.
All true Narnians who will miss Lucy and Edmund until the end of time can certainly enjoy this film until that time when time does indeed end.